AgentReady
AgentReady LabsRunningFix verified

GrailHawk

A collectibles reference site used to test the ordinary standalone Site loop. grailhawk.com

Live receipts
3
Last observed
Aug 14, 2026
Latest recorded article
How to value a collectible when there are no recent sales

Experiment overview

What this project is testing

The question, ownership, and evidence boundary in one place.

Current hypothesis

Evidence-led reference pages may become useful source material in later dated answer observations.

This is a prediction to test, not an outcome claim.

Ownership disclosure

We built these sites to test AgentReady on ourselves. Everything we do to grow them is public.

Owned and operated by the AgentReady team as a ratified Labs dataset. This is not presented as independent customer proof.

Daily run receipts are missing

This page can prove the publications and product events below. It cannot prove that a planned topic shipped, or explain a no-output run, until the daily operator ledger is added to the public read model.

Published work

What is actually live

Every approved same-domain canonical in the current public feed, newest first.

Publication ledger

3 live canonicals recorded

Newest receipt Jul 29, 2026

These are the articles this public source can prove are live. If a canonical is not in this list, this page does not claim it shipped.

  1. How to value a collectible when there are no recent sales

    https://grailhawk.com/blog/value-a-collectible-with-no-recent-sales

    Page measurement pending
  2. How to compare collectible prices without mixing bad comps

    https://grailhawk.com/blog/compare-collectible-prices-without-bad-comps

    Page measurement pending
  3. Page measurement pending

Counts exact live canonicals from AgentReady verification and Site publication receipts. Operator editorials remain labelled in the source ledger and are not treated as recommendation fixes. Per-post GSC and top queries use the connected 28-day Search Console window.

Measurements

What the sources observed

Dated product and Search Console observations. Movement is measured since publication, never claimed as caused by it.

Days in program

28

since July 17, 2026

Recommended fixes

91

current queue

Verified fixes

1

1 marked applied

AI-answer presence

0 of 292 answers

  • google0 of 127
  • openai0 of 113
  • perplexity0 of 52

Assistants answer differently run to run. These are counts across dated runs, not a rate we promise.

Readiness grade

Not measured on this source yet.

Search and publication ledger

GrailHawk in Google Search Console

Dated first-party measurements from the connected AgentReady account. Results are measured since publication where a canonical has page-level data, never because of it.

Tracked posts
3
AgentReady records
Impressions
1.6K
37 dated rows
Clicks
0
synced Aug 14, 2026
IMPRESSIONS2230CLICKS1Jul 6, 2026Aug 11, 2026

Evidence activity

One timeline, clear event types

Publication receipts and product evidence are combined by date but remain separately labelled. Newest evidence appears first.

1

Published

A live canonical receipt exists.

2

Applied

A recommendation was marked applied.

3

Verified

A later recrawl found it live.

4

Measured

A later dated source observation exists.

  1. Measured

    perplexity answer check

    0 of 12 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  2. Measured

    google answer check

    0 of 24 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  3. Measured

    openai answer check

    0 of 18 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  4. Measured

    perplexity answer check

    0 of 12 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  5. Measured

    google answer check

    0 of 24 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  6. Measured

    openai answer check

    0 of 15 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  7. Published

    How to value a collectible when there are no recent sales

    A same-domain live canonical was added to the public publication ledger.

  8. Published

    How to compare collectible prices without mixing bad comps

    A same-domain live canonical was added to the public publication ledger.

  9. Measured

    perplexity answer check

    0 of 17 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  10. Measured

    google answer check

    0 of 34 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  11. Measured

    openai answer check

    0 of 35 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  12. Measured

    perplexity answer check

    0 of 11 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

Show 10 older evidence events
  1. Measured

    google answer check

    0 of 22 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  2. Measured

    openai answer check

    0 of 22 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  3. Published

    Publish a "Which Rolex Cosmograph Daytona would you recommend?" comparison vs WatchBox

    A same-domain live canonical was added to the public publication ledger.

  4. Verified

    Publish a "Which Rolex Cosmograph Daytona would you recommend?" comparison vs WatchBox

    A later recrawl confirmed the artifact was live.

  5. Recrawl failed

    Publish a "Which Rolex Cosmograph Daytona would you recommend?" comparison vs WatchBox

    The recrawl did not find the artifact live at this time.

  6. Applied

    Publish a "Which Rolex Cosmograph Daytona would you recommend?" comparison vs WatchBox

    Recommendation marked applied with content-item.

  7. Measured

    google answer check

    0 of 11 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  8. Measured

    openai answer check

    0 of 11 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  9. Measured

    google answer check

    0 of 12 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

  10. Measured

    openai answer check

    0 of 12 answers mentioned the brand in this dated run.

Verified changes

What changed and what happened later

Recommendation records stay separate from editorial publication receipts. Each record shows its recrawl ladder and later observations.

comparison article

Publish a "Which Rolex Cosmograph Daytona would you recommend?" comparison vs WatchBox

Verified Jul 18, 2026
Verify by recrawlfailedpassed

Since this fix went live, the brand was mentioned in 0 of 24 answers (before: 0 of 2).

Measured since then, not necessarily because of it.

Method and limits

How to read this evidence

Known limitations and system gaps stay visible beside the results.

Limitations

  • A citation, a brand mention, and a recommendation are different observations.
  • This is one owned niche site, not evidence of typical customer outcomes.

Open system gaps

  • Durable autonomous cycle records are not in the public read model yet.
Public read model generated August 14, 2026
How AgentReady writes